Pasi Pirhonen wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:52:15PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>We usually release our first arch (i386) with a week of the upstream >>release and our other arches within a week after the first arch release. >> > > > I find it a bit offensive when it's brough out as it is above. > It really should be 'we have a policy of releasing i386 first > even when anything else would be ready before'. > Well, I appreciate the efforts of Johnny H. and if it takes a week or two, regardless of ARCH, so be it. He's doing a lot. What happens if he needs an extended vacation? He *is* CentOS, you know (that's not sarcasm). -- Jay
CentOS 4U2 timing.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Jay.Hilliard at disney.com (Hilliard, Jay)
- Date: Thu Sep 15 05:47:51 2005
- In-reply-to: <20050915042509.GA1077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200509141754.31515.lowen@xxxxxxxx> <1126738335.5550.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050915042509.GA1077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Johnny Hughes
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: William A. Mahaffey III
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Pasi Pirhonen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- References:
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Lamar Owen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Johnny Hughes
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- From: Pasi Pirhonen
- CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Prev by Date: Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next by Date: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Previous by thread: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Next by thread: CentOS 4U2 timing.
- Index(es):
 |