Maybe CentOS 7.4 would have backported compatibility for your hardware. I had similar issues with Intel GPU not being recognized, which was solved by "i915 preliminary hw support enabled" method. Try to have a look on that. On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:24 PM, wwp <subscript@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Matthew, > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:59:35 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote: > > > Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all > > > options that do work, so let's forget about "stable". > > > > In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly > > recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI > > compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month > > life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense. > > Right, I'm currently digging that way, struggling a bit w/ the way I > write the F26 ISO to a USB flashdrive (I'll succeed tomorrow, found > better howtos to get rid of unetbootin issues). > > Fedora could be stable enough even if not a standard/reference in > industry at all (which sticks to RH releases), I would have loved a > CentOS because it is way more compliant to my "corporate" needs (LTS), > but a Fedora could be do it, if it really does it, at least until > CentOS8 is out. > > > Regards, > > -- > wwp > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos