Hello Matthew, On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:59:35 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote: > > Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all > > options that do work, so let's forget about "stable". > > In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly > recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI > compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month > life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense. Right, I'm currently digging that way, struggling a bit w/ the way I write the F26 ISO to a USB flashdrive (I'll succeed tomorrow, found better howtos to get rid of unetbootin issues). Fedora could be stable enough even if not a standard/reference in industry at all (which sticks to RH releases), I would have loved a CentOS because it is way more compliant to my "corporate" needs (LTS), but a Fedora could be do it, if it really does it, at least until CentOS8 is out. Regards, -- wwp
Attachment:
pgpez2JTbxHc0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
