On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, mad.scientist.at.large@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Obnoxius, seems to be the order of the day for companies that started with "FOSS" but don't want to comply with the licensing they were once so happy about because it gave them a product at a very low cost. now everyone is getting greedy. Then again money for nothing is the american dream these days. Might be nice to change the wiki rather than frustrate new and old users
Obnoxious, is when someone thinks there is a requirement to give away binary rpms to a non-paying customer!! Please get your facts straight!! Having said that, if you do not need Samba AD support there are newer samba rpms available for FREE with Centos. if you need something newer than 4.2.10 on c-6 or 4.4.4 on c-7 or you need Samba AD support, I would suggest you download the src tarball from https://download.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/samba-4.6.6.tar.gz and build it yourself. It is trivial to build provided you follow the instructions @ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Build_Samba_from_Source. https://wiki.samba.org provides a wealth of information for configuring samba 4 In addition, if you have problems the people on the samba mailing go out of their way to help troubleshoot problems. HTH, -- Tom me@xxxxxxxxxx Spamtrap address me123@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
