Re: C7, systemd, say what?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:31:06AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> I would wholeheartedly disagree.  This IS something systemd
> specific.  I have never seen init.d blow itself up over bloody
> symlinks.  The readahead, while /possibly/ nice isn't at all
> necessary on modern hardware.  I want my hardware to boot
> consistently, not bomb like an Adam Sandler movie because of
> /symlinks/.

Now this is just silly. It didn't "blow itself up". Nothing blew up at
all. There are just messages logged. There is no actual problem.



-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux