> Am 03.03.2017 um 13:19 schrieb James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>>
>>>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would
>>>> seem rather irresponsible...
>>>
>>>
>>> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old
>>> versions of packages online either AFAIK.
>>>
>>> jh
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL
>> before I honestly have no idea ... I've asked on the epel-devel
>> mailing list as to whether it'll move to archive like old fedora
>> releases do.
>
> My mistake - I forgot there was an EPEL4 in the mists of time .. so
> the last version of the repo is likely to end up here:
>
> http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/
JFI:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/YTEBPQPLP7NIVR3C533EBHEAERPH26P3/
--
LF
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
