On 2017-03-03 14:14, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <CAGkb5vfXkJcbpQWupuZG0xp8_gTgv+55+YrZf8VdF0maiO9UfQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would
>>>>> seem rather irresponsible...
>>>> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old
>>>> versions of packages online either AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>> jh
>>> Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL
>>> before I honestly have no idea ... I've asked on the epel-devel
>>> mailing list as to whether it'll move to archive like old fedora
>>> releases do.
>> My mistake - I forgot there was an EPEL4 in the mists of time .. so
>> the last version of the repo is likely to end up here:
>>
>> http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/
> Cool, thanks!
>
> Tony
I am mirroring the EPEL from official mirrors and the EPEL4 content is
stills there:
1.9G pub/mirrors/epel/4
7.3G pub/mirrors/epel/5
15G pub/mirrors/epel/6
16G pub/mirrors/epel/7
//Zdenek
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
