Mozilla probably (finally) made the adjustment for 2160 lines of resolution.
LOTS of softwares need[ed] to tweak their interfaces to be usable on 4k
displays.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Gary Stainburn <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2017 10:22:19 John Hodrien wrote:
> > The safe bet is, it doesn't, and it's something unique to you/your
> > profile/your firefox configuration. Have you got an example URL that
> > you're saying obviously misrenders in firefox?
> >
> > Does it still misbehave if you run firefox in safe mode with a new
> profile,
> > say be doing: firefox --ProfileManager --safe-mode ?
> >
> > jh
> Most of the pages / sites that have issues are my own. Presumably this is
> because I don't include a CCS Reset Stylesheet so therefore rely on the
> browser defaults.
>
> There have been other broken sites but I can't recollect any at the moment.
>
> I'm guessnig at my problem arrises because for some reason at some point
> Firefox have changed a CSS default. Very frustrating as controlling the
> appearance of buttons through CSS to get exactly what you want seems very
> hard. I've managed to get the button looking right, but the text is wrong,
> or the text looks right but the button is wrong.
>
> Many people seem to have gone down the route of having clickable DIV's or
> A's
> which from a purist point of view just seems wrong. A button should be a
> button, a link a link.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
