Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage

["TE Dukes" <tdukes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frank Cox
> Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017 6:25 PM
> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  [OT] Network Attached Storage
> 
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:17:15 -0500
> TE Dukes wrote:
> 
> > I was looking at the QNAP 451+
> 
> I have a Qnap 251 that works fine as a nfs backup server.
> 
> I figure that it probably uses less power than something I put together
> myself.
> 
> I just use it as a nfs server.  It can do a ton of other stuff that I have
no need
> for and have never bothered to look into.
> 
> --
> MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com

The QNAP does have a lot of features that I'd probably never use. The only
issue I have is what would be the end of life support. Would that matter if
it's a backup device?

Thanks

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos