On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:17:15 -0500 TE Dukes wrote: > I was looking at the QNAP 451+ I have a Qnap 251 that works fine as a nfs backup server. I figure that it probably uses less power than something I put together myself. I just use it as a nfs server. It can do a ton of other stuff that I have no need for and have never bothered to look into. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage
- From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 17:25:29 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <003501d2654e$5bac7910$13056b30$@palmettoshopper.com>
- References: <003501d2654e$5bac7910$13056b30$@palmettoshopper.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage
- From: TE Dukes
- Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage
- References:
- [OT] Network Attached Storage
- From: TE Dukes
- [OT] Network Attached Storage
- Prev by Date: Re: cron job failures with a perl script containing Astro::Time
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage
- Previous by thread: [OT] Network Attached Storage
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Network Attached Storage
- Index(es):
 |