Re: [SOLVED... prolly] Re: "installation source" specification for netinstall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:23:46AM -0500, ken wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 09:37 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> >This one works:
> >
> >http://mirrors.mit.edu/centos/7/os/x86_64/
> >
> >I know because I/ve used it for net installs twice in the last
> >week or two,  most recently a Thursday of last week.
> >
> >>>Believe me, I  wish it  did  work.  I've been at this stupid
> >>>specification which should be easy and done over with hours ago.
> >>>But it doesn't work.
> >I agreee that it would be nice to have some better doc on how to
> >choose the URL for a net install, I've stumbled around in the dark
> >at times past trying to figure it out, too.
> >
> >but it definitely DOES work if you get the URL right (and if you have
> >your networking set up correctly, and the mirror isn't broken, and...,
> >and..., etc.).
> >
> >Fred
> 
> After setting up again another the next  morning (yesterday), mit
> didn't work either.  The networking was set up alright-- the  third
> time setting up everything for the third time, and, after all, the
> configuration page confirmed networking.  What could be wrong?
> Well, I went back  into the  networking config page and saw it was
> actually all wrong.  It didn't for some reason didn't  even change
> the  configuration I put in even after clicking on "Done" (several
> times).  Apparently, 'networking connection' to this setup page must
> have understood to that to mean only TCP/IP level 2 connection to
> the AP... yes, it could talk to the AP, but not make an actual to
> the network.  At this point I couldn't trust  netinstall anymore,
> wiped it, and yesterday burned and loaded and  installed a LiveCD.
> 
> Days ago, when wrestling with repos setting up, it occurred to me it
> would be nice for the app to have a small console in it, something
> which could be used to confirm (by hand) networking was correct and
> that URLs were there and active... it would be simple.  Apparently
> it's a bad idea for some reason to make any improvements over what
> comes from upstream.  (Sigh.)
> 
> Thanks, Fred, for the tip.  I'll augment your tip: don't believe it
> when the netinstall configuration says it's (allegedly) correctly
> configured.

During installation CTRL-ALT-F2, I believe, wikll give you a console
at which you can verify the networking configuration. To be honest,
I can never remember which of the screens accessible by ctrl-alt-fX is
the right one, but I think it's f2, and its not hard to tell by
trying f2, f3, etc.

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------
   "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
              it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart."  
---------------------------- Hebrews 4:12 (niv) ------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux