Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one
>> of
>> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
>> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement.
>> So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the
>> development process, but that developers don't need to poke their noses
>> out to the end users... or at least, that's how I read what you're
>> saying.
>
> If you want to go out of your way to read it that way, it's hard to
> stop you. However, it's not what I'm saying. The development process is
> conducted in the open for a reason.
I don't see that as going "out of my way". Let's put it this way: how many
times have folks on the development side poked their nose in here - the
general redhat list is pretty dead - and asked anything? I've been here
since '09, and I *think* that maybe once, *maybe* twice, someone asked
something here, who was on that side of the house.
Perhaps, if it's open, it should be a two way street, not one way, for us
to take time from what we're being paid for, to hit that side.
Oh, and btw, we *do* have a few RH licenses... and for those who have to
deal with smart card ID cards, you can thank my manager for pushing
through native support in RHEL 7. So I guess you could say we do,
sometimes, go to the development side.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
