Re: Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:
> 
>> AFAIK, the 7(1503) format is used only on the websites, and internally
>> CentOS uses 7.1.1503. Do you see this as an issue?
> 
> Yes. It confuses humans. There have been a bunch of examples given of
> how it confuses humans. A simple fix for this human issue is to use
> 7.1.1503 on the website, here on the mailing list, etc.

And then we’re right back in the same old boat: With every new release, the same old thread will pop up, “How do I make my servers stay on CentOS 7.1?”

Give up on the point release idea.  It’s CentOS 7; there is no CentOS 7.1.  The only reason there’s a YYMM part is that it’s a media respin.  Best ignore that wherever practical.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux