Re: Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/12/15 15:52, John Hodrien wrote:

> To me, I'm not sure I get any issues or advantages from the new scheme,
> but I
> can't say it bothers me greatly.

This is the thing that bothers me most - that folks dont have a good
grasp on what / why the numbering is working like this.

We are still a small team, and all efforts are flat out on getting the
iso media and images done, out of the door - but as soon as I have this
done, I'll look at hosting some google hangouts, irc sessions and maybe
a longer email thread as well to lay out the numbering proposition.

-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux