On 12/03/15 20:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is only
capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which next event is
deterministically predictable from previous. As with fatal things like
kernel panic, it is the previous before the fatalstep is the one that
you still can see...
This has nothing to do with systemd or a parallelized boot. The kernel
panic is happening during the initial load of the kernel and initialization
of hardware.
I know you love to blame every problem on systemd, but c’mon, this problem
is going to happen with *EVERY* init system.
No, *you* don't understand what we're saying: pre-systemd, if the o/p saw that
one stmt before the panic, they could look at what the system was doing
*sequentially*, and so have an idea what it was failing on. With systemd's
parallelism, we have no clue, other than what it's done, and no idea what's
happening that's failing.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
