Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Am 03.12.2015 um 22:24 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> CentOS should do whatever RHEL/Upstream does.
> 
> Period.


I sometimes misguide myself in doing; CentOS = RHEL, but 
the truth is, that CentOS is not exactly the same as RHEL!



> Why the change now? It really does matter, a lot, to those of us who need
> to do compliance testing/security checks, etc. all based on "version"
> number. I know there is no such thing in practice because of all the
> non-sequential updates that happen, but there's a shit-ton of work that we
> have to do for each new release, and we have depended in the past on the
> versions matching the RHEL ones. Now, they don't, and that's wrong.
> 
> It seems like a minor thing, but in real-world practice it is most
> definitely not.



As stated by others - this provisioning concept never was supported by CentOS.

--
LF




_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux