On 12/03/2015 04:24 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
... ton of work that we have to do for each new release, and we have depended in the past on the versions matching the RHEL ones. Now, they don't, and that's wrong.
I would respectfully disagree here, in that my opinion is that relying on any distribution minor version number in the first place is what is wrong. (And I think that regardless of which distribution we're talking about....)
I honestly wish Red Hat would have stuck to the 'XupdateY' format that they started with, as that is more correct. The update rollup number is not a minor version number in the strict sense of the word, at least IMO.
Heh, I am waiting to see if the differences between RHEL 7.2 and RHEL 7.3 will be as large as the differences were between RHL 7.2 and RHL 7.3 back in the day......
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
