Re: Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

[Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:

> Can we take the license wanking off the list please?  I don't think
> either of the people arguing are actually lawyers, so it has no
> relevance.

Relevance is not dependent on being, or not being, a lawyer. Relevance
for inclusion on the mailing list is a close connection to
Centos/RHEL :-)

-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.      Je suis Charlie.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos