Am 08.04.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 2015-04-08, Leon Fauster <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> gdm is a "sub-process" of X ... >> > Not according to the output of pstree. See the following snippet: oh, i had something in mind that obviously is obsolete, okay :-) -- LF _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Leon Fauster <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:46:46 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <slrnmiavl0.fh0.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet>
- References:
- The future of centos
- From: Francis Gerund
- Re: The future of centos
- From: Digimer
- Re: The future of centos
- From: Nux!
- Re: The future of centos
- From: Bill Maltby (C4B)
- Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Liam O'Toole
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: David Both
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Liam O'Toole
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Leon Fauster
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Liam O'Toole
- The future of centos
- Prev by Date: Re: 6.5 install dvd won't
- Next by Date: Re: yum upgrade of an older 6.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next by thread: Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Index(es):
 |