On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:16:48PM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: > Xorg is in fact a sub-sub-process of gdm-binary. Yup. In fact, it's possible to run GDM without X at all, such as when you're running display manager with XDMCP. -- Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:27:23 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <slrnmiavl0.fh0.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
- References:
- The future of centos
- From: Francis Gerund
- Re: The future of centos
- From: Digimer
- Re: The future of centos
- From: Nux!
- Re: The future of centos
- From: Bill Maltby (C4B)
- Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Liam O'Toole
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: David Both
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Liam O'Toole
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Leon Fauster
- Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- From: Liam O'Toole
- The future of centos
- Prev by Date: 6.5 install dvd won't
- Next by Date: yum upgrade of an older 6.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next by thread: Re: Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Index(es):
 |