On 02/04/15 20:47, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 04/02/2015 02:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release >>>> names would >>>> have been nice. >>>> >>> >>> We did. >>> >>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html >>> >>> >>> >> WE'RE NOT ON THE DEVEL LIST! > > WHY NOT? > Would it have made a difference? Yes, you asked on that list. And yes, nearly everyone who responded said no to the change, yet you did it anyway. If Matthew had been on the list, and had also responded against the change, would his voice have made the difference? Seriously, show me a post in that thread from someone not on the CentOS board speaking strongly in favour of the change. It's a big thread. The point is, you asked and the community said no (at least those who were subscribed to the -devel list and took the time to respond). Yet you did it anyway. The damage is done now, you can't take it back. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos