On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 04/02/2015 02:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> >>> >>> Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release >>>> names would >>>> have been nice. >>>> >>>> >>> We did. >>> >>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html >>> >>> >>> >>> WE'RE NOT ON THE DEVEL LIST! >> > > WHY NOT? > > >> Yes, I'm shouting. >> > > I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT > > > Seriously though, the change was brought up over a month ago on the -devel > list. When we're asking for feedback about possible changes, it's on the > -devel list, because it's about the development of the distro. If you want > to give input for the direction of the distro, that's the place to do it. I > would encourage anyone who's interested to join. > > >From the "Community" page: "CentOS-devel This list is a discussion list about the current and further development of CentOS. If you have questions regarding CentOS, please use the main centos list - this is strictly about development. " Most of us are not involved in development of CentOS, and don't have the time to monitor such a mailing list for possible changes we might want to be aware of. Major changes that effect day-to-day operations should be vetted through the main list, in my opinion. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos