On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Warren Young <wyml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I found:
>>>
>>> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html
>>>
>>> where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0:
>>>
>>> 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3
>
> That’s only for RHEL 7: http://goo.gl/AtjIyI
Aside from being irritating, that's just wrong. I'm using that
syntax on Centos5,
>> ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0
>> NETMASK0=255.255.128.0
>> GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3
>
> This is the scheme used in prior versions of RHEL.
I think both types of syntax will work in all versions. The GUI tools
do the latter form.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
