On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Johnny, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> bump >>>> >>>> If I could build it, I would. At the present time, i can not build it >>>> as the source is not on ftp.redhat.com or git.centos.org. >>>> >>>> Red Hat does not have permission for it to be built anywhere besides >>>> their supplemental channel for RHEL6, and I have asked Red Hat legal and >>>> they are trying to get permission from Google to release it in CentOS. >>>> >>>> I am sorry, but I can't build and release it at this time. I may not be >>>> able to do so, even though I really, really do want to release it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks for the update Johnny. So was version 38 just a one time special >>> permission thing? >>> >>> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ >> >> I very much got yelled at for that. >> >> > > wait,... I thought Chromium was "open source"... you need a license > to distribute it? (note that I haven't researched which license it > uses...) > Red Hat has permission to distribute, to paying customers, pieces of it that are not open source. I need to get permission to strip parts of that out and distribute the rest. I have asked for permission and am waiting on the answers of: 1. Can do that (take out some pieces and distribute) 2. If I can do that, are the pieces I took out good enough or do I need to make more changes. I want to make this happen and I am trying to do so. However, I have no idea what the outcome will be. One thing is for sure, people are watching me very closely on this .. therefore I must do it exactly the way they want me to.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
