On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Johnny, >>>>> >>>>> Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> bump >> >> If I could build it, I would. At the present time, i can not build it >> as the source is not on ftp.redhat.com or git.centos.org. >> >> Red Hat does not have permission for it to be built anywhere besides >> their supplemental channel for RHEL6, and I have asked Red Hat legal and >> they are trying to get permission from Google to release it in CentOS. >> >> I am sorry, but I can't build and release it at this time. I may not be >> able to do so, even though I really, really do want to release it. >> >> >> > Thanks for the update Johnny. So was version 38 just a one time special > permission thing? > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ I very much got yelled at for that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
