On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > BTW:
> >
> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
> >
> >
> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official
> "supplementary" ones from RH?
>
> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment,
> etc... ?
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
I don't know, and that's the point! Personally, I'd be OK with using it,
but since my work is audited by the Federal Gum'mint, I don't know how
they'd feel about it. :)
--
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphelps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
