Re: Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 18/01/15 03:45 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
updated.


Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate
copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'll
continue perusing and referring to the RHEL 6 and 7 documentation.
_______________________________________________

Alright then.  May I suggest a solution that might satisfy both opinions.

On the documentation page where the links to CentOS [345] are found
place a statement to this effect:

"CentOS is functionally equivalent to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

but its not.

and is based on the same code, as released by Red Hat, and rebuilt by
the CentOS community."  At this point briefly explain the moral

that does not make it functionally equivalent.

conundrum that prevents you from linking directly to the RHEL
documentation.  Then provide the appropriate link to the appropriate
RHEL documentation with the explanation that, "this is a link to the
documentation for RHEL upon which CentOS is based."  There you have a
disclaimer as well as an attribution.

What say yea to this proposal?

why not just say 'CentOS Linux is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux
sources as released via git.centos.org and therefore documentation
applicable to Red Hat Enterprise Linux should largely apply to CentOS
Linux of the same version, architecture and release.'

And leave it at that ( note: no linking, therefore no assertions of
compatibility or equivallencce ).

An undocumented computer program differs only slightly from a video
game.  Both are filled with mysteries, puzzles, and unanswered questions.

Therefore, lets do the right thing - get the means together in community
to adapt those docs, brand them accordingly and publish them under
centos.org

Is it legal to copy the documentation and replace trademarks? IANAL... :)

Alternatively, if we can't copy RHEL docs, can we copy Fedora 12~13, 18~19 docs and adapt as needed? Or would be have to write everything from scratch?

--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux