Re: Systemd Adding Its Own Console To Linux Systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 08-10-2014 15:18, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On 08-10-2014 14:36, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Just a heads up to those who haven't seen this yet. The main author of
systemd publicly wrote about being basically persecuted.

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LennartPoetteringTheOneAndOnly/posts/J2TZrTvu7vd

But oddly, he didn't even mention that there would be a real simple
solution - just add backwards-compatible improvements instead of
actively wrecking the interfaces everyone else had depended on for
decades.

"decades". That, by itself, already calls for an update, no?

Why? Do you ride a bicycle differently, or drive differently, than you did
say, 20 years ago? You went out and bought a recumbent, or an electric
car?

Well, yes. Bit off topic now, but yes. The core way of doing it, is the same, but nowadays if I don't wear proper clothing and pay extra attention, I'll probably be overrun in the next corner. It changed.. I can't ride it just like before.

While we're at it, can you tell me how much better a brand new microwave,
with 20 touch-buttons for misguessing how long to cook something, is
better than the old microwave I used to have that had a "cook/defrost"
dial, and a timer dial?
<snip>

Heh.. so let's all use mud jars instead of plastic ones, or ceramic pans instead of the nonadherent ones we have nowadays. ;)

Ok, that aside, sorry, I'm not saying that having 20 touch-buttons is right/better, though. If you don't like it, don't buy it.. But the old dial is gone because (some) people needed something else, just that... My dial used to break now and then, btw, and touch buttons are easier to clean up, IMO. Mine has a grill feature that I never used for ~7 years. When I tried to use, it burnt and left the food smelling melted plastic. ;D IOW, no good for me, at least for now. But if I find a recipe that needs it, perhaps I'll fix my microwave just to try it.

Like for firewalld and systemd, as they were already mentioned in here.
It's hard _just because_ it's different. But wait, wasn't iptables
different from ipchains? And is nftables going to be as the same as
iptables? No, of course not. There are features in nftables that you
can't put into iptables cleanly, so you need a new workflow on it.

Actually, I struggled with ipchains, and found iptables much simpler. I've
yet to see anyone suggest that systemd is "simpler".

Heh, me too, but well, 20 buttons is more complex than 1 dial, yet more practical if you know how to use them.

Marcelo

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux