On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 12:51 +0100, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, lee wrote:
>
> > Is the Subject: header required by some RFC? If it is, I'll also
> > deny messages that don't have one.
> Not as far as I'm aware. RFC5322, "Internet Message Format",
> contains:
>
> The only required header fields are the origination date field and
> the originator address field(s). All other header fields are
> syntactically optional. More information is contained in the table
> following this definition.
There is a real difference between the lack of a Subject: header and a
present but empty Subject: header.
I reject emails with no Subject: headers but accept empty Subject:
headers because even I can occasionally forget to type-in a Subject.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
