On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:11 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Mon, September 29, 2014 12:59 pm, Chris Beattie wrote:
>
> > Nothing in this message is intended to make or accept an offer or to form
> > a contract, except that an attachment that is an image of a contract
> > bearing the signature of an officer of our company may be or become a
> > contract. This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
> > the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. It may
> > contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged,
> > confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may
> > constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, we hereby notify you that any use, dissemination, distribution,
> > or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> > this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and
> > delete this message immediately.
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> I was about to answer the question then all of a sudden my eye caught this
> footer which offended me, so I decided mention this fact instead of
> answering question...
>
> Valeri
>
> PS I never feel obliged to anything that is sent to me in e-mail without
> me originally soliciting it. All obligations lie purely on the sender.
> This has always be that way and will always be no matter whether I read
> your crap or not (sorry, everybody who does not send e-mail with that
> crap, it is really difficult to hold one's feelings when you just got
> offended).
That signature is time-wasting meaningless waffle (or gibberish, if one
prefers). It has no legal worth despite the 'efforts' of the untrained
legal expert who composed it :-)
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
