On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Vojin Urosevic <vu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> > A third source is companies with homegrown code deployed on CentOS >> > servers and poor-quality test suites. They tend to be in the "omg >> > never change anything unless forced at gunpoint!" camp. It's an >> > unfortunate situation, and it can cost a lot of money and time to fix. >> >> >Or even with decent test suites you recognize that you can't perfectly >> >mulate a live internet-connected production environment. Or you've >> >>been burned by updates that did break things and the time it took to >> >f>nd a workaround. There's just no getting around complicated systems >> >being complicated. > > > Hence the need for immutable infrastructure. Sure, right after the last bug is found and fixed. Meanwhile we balance the risk of change against the risk of not changing. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos