On 09/27/2014 10:29 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > uh. is this system even patched for heartbleed? EL5 was never vulnerable to heartbleed to begin with, that said, your point is still valid as to other vulnerabilities. Peter _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- From: Peter <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:10:29 +1200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CABzZrXeHF5mgrR93eqftDRP_=76oO0gmXD4jAwi+hGQB3=4_3w@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
- References:
- URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- From: Jessica Blank
- Re: URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- From: Always Learning
- Re: URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- From: Eero Volotinen
- URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- Prev by Date: Re: firefox: annoyance
- Next by Date: Re: URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- Previous by thread: Re: URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4
- Next by thread: webcam program for continuous recording.
- Index(es):
 |