On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen <jvermeulen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus....
<snip>
It is *completely* unacceptable to release an update that appears to
ignore the configuration files, and doesn't even *show* the menu, which
would absolutely freak out an "ordinary user".
And to lose the tabs! I am *not* going to update firefox at work till
they fix this - I have stuff I need.
<snip>
Switch to Palemoon or Qupzilla, firefox has "improved" itself to the
point where it's just not a choice anymore, let alone a good one. I've
been using Palemoon and it's been a damn good choice for me... ymmv
palemoon looks nice - *is* there a package for it somewhere, or do you
have to d/l and install from their homepage?
Find something else that works for you, there are other choices. It's
gotten to the point where firefox is as bad as chrome or ie. A shame,
it used to be such a good choice.
I have to worry, here at work. I am *not* going to even think about trying
to force my users to use another browser, one they've never heard of (I've
never heard of either of these). This needs to be fixed....
yup, that would be the fly in the ointment. It's certainly not in the
distro's I use (base,extras,updates,rpmforge,epel). I did find qupzilla
in linux mint, but not palemoon and neither in the centos distro's that
I use. Can't speak to other systems.
For a mass install you pretty much have to roll your own. I've only
used it on individual systems that I work with directly and downloaded
from the website. I can only speak to my personal use. Hopefully it
will start showing up in the distro's, we definitely need something
other than firefox these days.
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
