Re: Some thoughts on systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Jul 19, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 09:08 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
> 
>> It is actually funny how there seems to be so many opponents of systemd 
>> who want back the old ways of doing things.
> 
> These are the causes:-
> 
> 1. Familiarity with something that works and can be modified without
> much effort- very important consideration in the computer world.
> 
> 2. "Conservative" because new software is renown for creating "time
> wasting" frustration and irritation and sometimes "breakdowns".
> 
> 3. Adherer to the principle "If it is working, do not repair or replace
> it".
> 
> 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement.
> 
> 
> The systemd files do look like Windoze .ini files.

Times change, things evolve, adapt or go the way of the dodo

> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul.
> England, EU.
> 
>   Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
>   Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux