On 07/08/2014 11:05 AM, Russell Miller wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2014, at 7:58 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> and the next one talking before try to get informations
>> there is no monolithic daemon damned
>>
>> there is one project with one source tree maintaining
>> a lot of daemons and binaries - so be quite before
>> you tried to learn some basics
> Generally when people get personal I figure I must have hit a nerve.
>
> I must have hit a nerve.
>
> I didn't say it was windows-like. I said it was more windows-like than I was
> comfortable with. Even with multiple daemons, It's still not very transparent,
> somewhat incomrehensible, documented poorly while still managing to have
> voluminous documentation, dumps stuff everywhere, and is just generally
> annoying.
>
> Even its sysv compatibility is incomplete. It runs sysv scripts, but in such a
> way as to break any but the simplest. I've run into situations where I've actually
> had to make a systemd unit because it broke the script, and I couldn't fix it. The
> script was fine, ran perfectly if you just ran it, and systemd did... *something*...
> to it. I still haven't figured out what. And debugging is an absolute pain.
I am also struggling with this and the HIPL code (on F20). If you just
start the services, it takes about 5 min to complete. If you just run
the programs and tell them to drop into the background it is a handful
of seconds. Strip out comments from the script and it starts right up
with systemctl. Huh? What is going on? I was told that systemctl does
seem to try and make 'sense' out of comments...
>
> And that's all I'm saying in response to you. Keep this up
> and my killfile will have one more entry.
>
> --Russell
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
