Oliver Schad wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:05:07 -0700
> Russell Miller <duskglow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> Generally when people get personal I figure I must have hit a nerve.
>>
>> I must have hit a nerve.
>>
>> I didn't say it was windows-like. I said it was more windows-like
>> than I was comfortable with. Even with multiple daemons, It's still
>> not very transparent, somewhat incomrehensible, documented poorly
>> while still managing to have voluminous documentation, dumps stuff
>> everywhere, and is just generally annoying.
>>
>> Even its sysv compatibility is incomplete. It runs sysv scripts, but
>> in such a way as to break any but the simplest. I've run into
>> situations where I've actually had to make a systemd unit because it
>> broke the script, and I couldn't fix it. The script was fine, ran
>> perfectly if you just ran it, and systemd did... *something*... to
>> it. I still haven't figured out what. And debugging is an absolute
>> pain.
>>
>> And that's all I'm saying in response to you. Keep this up
>> and my killfile will have one more entry.
>
> We don't care in facts. We just believe. So if you don't believe in
> systemd and Poettering, go away. We make religion, not technology.
Right. Can we get him to stop Peottering around in our gardens, and go
play in one that does not affect so many people negatively?
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
