On 07/08/2014 04:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 08.07.2014 14:58, schrieb Adrian Sevcenco: >> On 07/08/2014 04:22 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 20:46 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/07/2014 07:47 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>>> Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of >>>>> Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards). >>>>> >>>>> Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ? >>> >>>> So you are following the thread on the Fedora list? I have been >>>> ignoring it. >>> >>> No. I read some of >>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_topic&q=systemd >>> >>> The systemd proponent, advocate and chief developer? wants to >>> abolish /etc and /var in favour of having the /etc and /var data >>> in /usr. >> err.. what? even on that wild fedora thread this did not come up!!! >> >> i will presume that you understood well your information source and you >> are actually know what you are referring to ... so, could you elaborate >> more about this?(with some references) >> i use systemd for some time (and i keep myslef informed about it) and i >> would need to know in time about this kind of change.. > > if you need to know about changes the read the systemd-devel list and announcements > like http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-July/020903.html > > as so often the OP has no clue what he is talking about > because he ignores systemd as many other things completly > while think at the same time he can have a valid opinion > in details > > systemd-upstream discusses how to get /etc and /var in default > installs empty to contain *only user data* and no default > configurations which are placed below /usr and can be overriden > like systemd-units from the user > > the deeper reason is to achieve over long that a system can > boot without any configuration and so provide a clean way > for "vendor reset" in case of mobile devices, aplliances > and where ever you want to ship a defined environment which > can be reset at any point in time Thanks for info ... actually i am (pretty much) up to date with what is happening (i don't follow systemd-devel but i am following Lennart Poettering and Kay Sievers on g+) My remark was kind of tongue-in-chick with regard to "abolish" word.. And of the OP : the move of defaults to /usr is/was expected as from the beginning the usr consolidation was prepared in order to have a common system shared over network And about new mechanics of systemd: i can wait to see how seamless will be the use of chef/puppet tools on systemd systems. (and on any other cloud stacks) Adrian
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
