On 12/20/2013 10:47 AM, Warren Young wrote: > I also agree that 1000:1 seems like the far edge of the probability > curve. That would mean EL6 is 1/50 the total interactive desktop Linux > market. It could be that bad, given that most EL6 machines are probably > headless servers. the 50 or so dedicated and virtual EL systems I wrangle are all headless. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: And then there was one (browser)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:53:59 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <52B490CB.4080505@etr-usa.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- References:
- And then there was one (browser)
- From: Robert Arkiletian
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: Darr247
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: Warren Young
- And then there was one (browser)
- Prev by Date: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- Next by Date: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- Previous by thread: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- Next by thread: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- Index(es):
 |