On 12/19/2013 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > How can XP, an ancient OS going EOL in a few months, still be > supported for the latest Chromium but C6 not? how many XP systems are still in use? how many people use C6 as a desktop? also, Microsoft has done a remarkable version of maintaining BINARY compatibility across many versions, something Linux has traditionally eschewed. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: And then there was one (browser)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:06:47 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAN_+rpLDLMPUT7kN+3CmCcxjsPkAVh4TNbs0ub+aB_7EEmTzgQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- From: Darr247
- Re: And then there was one (browser)
- References:
- And then there was one (browser)
- From: Robert Arkiletian
- And then there was one (browser)
- Prev by Date: And then there was one (browser)
- Next by Date: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- Previous by thread: And then there was one (browser)
- Next by thread: Re: And then there was one (browser)
- Index(es):
 |