Cliff, Thanks for taking the time to offer help, I apologize for not seeing your note a long time ago. Unfortunately, there are many of our clients that prefer fax transmissions over e-mail. The only reason that for this that makes any sense is that a successful fax transmission or an incomplete fax transmission can be processed with a log entry so that there is proof of a successful fax. Obviously this can be done via a return receipt in e-mail but the receiver of the e-mail may not elect to do a return receipt which means a log entry of receipt is not 100+ACU. Also, there are just still a bunch of clients that communicate via fax and not e-mail, as much as I would prefer e-mail. -- Greg Ennis PoMec Corporation www.PoMec.Net -----Original Message----- From: Cliff Pratt +ADw-enkiduonthenet+AEA-gmail.com+AD4 Reply-to: CentOS mailing list +ADw-centos+AEA-centos.org+AD4 To: CentOS mailing list +ADw-centos+AEA-centos.org+AD4 Subject: Re: +AFs-CentOS+AF0 ghostscript-8.70-14.el5+AF8-8.1.x86+AF8-64 +ACY hylafax+- 5.5.3 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:22:23 +-1200 Greg, I haven't sent a fax in ages, so my suggestion would be to take a step back and see if you still need to use fax. You may still have a need for it, but I'm just suggesting that you think about it+ACE Cheers, Cliff On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Gregory P. Ennis +ADw-PoMec+AEA-pomec.net+AD4 wrote: +AD4 On 08/05/2013 12:26 AM, John R Pierce wrote: +AD4 +AD4 On 8/4/2013 3:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: +AD4 +AD4APg First try installing compiled rpm on a TEST system, and if that does not +AD4 +AD4APg work you can try recompiling the source rpm, or ask someone to help you, +AD4 +AD4APg maybe maintainer of ghostscript in Fedora. +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 if you rebuild it via the RPM, it likely will overwrite the 'stock' +AD4 +AD4 ghostscript. +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 a tarball install could be built to run in /usr/local/ghostscript/... or +AD4 +AD4 /opt/mystuff/ghostscript/... or whatever, and not interfere with the +AD4 +AD4 distribution build. +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 That is true if hylafax can be pointed to use optional version of +AD4 ghostcript. +AD4 +AD4 If that is not the case, then ghostscript has to be replaced. +AD4 +AD4 P.S. I am not a hylafax user so I can not determine what should be done. +AD4 +AD4 ------------------------------------------------------------------ +AD4 +AD4 Everyone, +AD4 +AD4 Thanks so much for everyone's help +ACEAIQAhACE +AD4 +AD4 I am a new hylafax+- user and other than the ghostscript problem I am +AD4 very impressed. Hylafax+- does allow you to control the location of +AD4 ghostscript so once I get it compiled I should be able to point it to +AD4 the correct version. Instead of using the Fedora RPM, I am going to +AD4 compile it and try to route the files to a different location. I really +AD4 screwed up a different system trying to do an rpm install with a Fedora +AD4 module with a different piece of software. I am a little gun shy about +AD4 doing that again. +AD4 +AD4 I am using Hylafax+- on CentOS 5.9 to replace a vsifax system installed +AD4 on SCO. If I can get ghostscript 9.07 installed properly this will be a +AD4 very good replacement. +AD4 +AD4 If any of you have additional suggestions, I sure appreciate your help. +AD4 +AD4 Greg +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXw +AD4 CentOS mailing list +AD4 CentOS+AEA-centos.org +AD4 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos +AD4 +AF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXw CentOS mailing list CentOS+AEA-centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
