Re: ghostscript-8.70-14.el5_8.1.x86_64 & hylafax+ 5.5.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 08/05/2013 12:26 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/4/2013 3:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> First try installing compiled rpm on a TEST system, and if that does not
>> work you can try recompiling the source rpm, or ask someone to help you,
>> maybe maintainer of ghostscript in Fedora.
>
> if you rebuild it via the RPM, it likely will overwrite the 'stock'
> ghostscript.
>
> a tarball install could be built to run in /usr/local/ghostscript/... or
> /opt/mystuff/ghostscript/... or whatever, and not interfere with the
> distribution build.
>

That is true if hylafax can be pointed to use optional version of 
ghostcript.

If that is not the case, then ghostscript has to be replaced.

P.S. I am not a hylafax user so I can not determine what should be done.


-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux