On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Markus Falb <wnefal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 25.Sep.2013, at 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 25.09.2013 18:39, schrieb Markus Falb:
> >> On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> >>
> >>> This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that
> >>> something with the server certificate is not ok.
> >>
> >> oh my,
> >> centos says it's php thing
> >> php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=138011820514388
> >>
> >> The backporting oath?
> >
>
Yes, backporting makes this interesting when seeking support.
Ultimately it's a question for CentOS (or Upstream).
>
> > that's why CentOS/RHEL provides 5.3 packages without break environments
> rely on 5.1
>
> It really doesn't break? I cant believe that.
>
(Echoing John Pierce's warning...)
If you update from PHP 5.1 or 5.2 to 5.3 you will have problems to deal
with.
I made the move and I too had broken code to fix!
[ Although the fixes/modifications are rather easy (just in case you have
to go that direction). ]
> --
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
--
---~~.~~---
Mike
// SilverTip257 //
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
