On 25.Sep.2013, at 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.09.2013 18:39, schrieb Markus Falb:
>> On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>
>>> This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that
>>> something with the server certificate is not ok.
>>
>> oh my,
>> centos says it's php thing
>> php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=138011820514388
>>
>> The backporting oath?
>
> any why do you not update your crap?
> PHP 5.1 is irrelevant these days
Now I am irritated. RHEL 5 is supported until 2017, so is CentOS 5, isn't it?
It comes with php and it comes with php53. You tell me I am a crapper because I use php.
I would have expected such things from the php mailing list, but on CentOS….
In other words, do not tell me on the CentOS Mailing List that I am dumb if I use a package provided by CentOS (that's silly)
> that's why CentOS/RHEL provides 5.3 packages without break environments rely on 5.1
It really doesn't break? I cant believe that.
--
Markus
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
