On 08/26/2013 09:33 AM Joerg Schilling wrote: > ken <gebser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> This cdfs does not deliver better quality than from using the "read audio" >>> ioctls from the kernel. Cdda2wav gives much better quylity in case of >>> non-optiimal media and cdda2wav gives you the meta data you need to make a >>> decent copy. You don't get that from cdfs. >>> >>> Jörg >>> >> >> I was asking about *mounting* an audio CD. Is there a way to mount an >> audio CD in any of the software you mentioned? > > No, but why do you like to "mount" an audio CD? > > Jörg > I gave a couple reasons previously in this thread... too involved to repeat. There must be a lot of other reasons if so many people have spent time developing cdfs for so long a time. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos