ken <gebser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Then too of course there'd need to be a way to ascertain if there was > any substantial differences in the outputs. There's some code out there > since kernel version 2.2 called cdfs which doesn't seem to be on my > (v.5.9) system. This allows mounting an audio CD or a disk image of one > so that it can be examined and, presumably, manipulated. In fact, maybe > this is all I need at the moment... that is, after cloning the CD to a > disk image, it might be possible to edit the track data prior to > burning. I don't burn CDs that often, so this would be an acceptable > solution. This cdfs does not deliver better quality than from using the "read audio" ioctls from the kernel. Cdda2wav gives much better quylity in case of non-optiimal media and cdda2wav gives you the meta data you need to make a decent copy. You don't get that from cdfs. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni) joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos