John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/20/2013 1:47 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Reindl Harald<h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> > >Please do not write false claims! > >> > > >> >says the one on his fight against Linux and GNU since years > > Do you like to prove that you cannot stay with the truth? > > Is your code and its dependencies entirely GPL licensed? Is your favorite Linux distro entirely GPL licensed? > The allegation was that some of it is CDDL, which is problematic. The CDDL was accepted as definitely OSS compliant by bopensource.org within 14 days and without to mention problems. The GPL did take a longer time to get approved because the GPL license text is in conflict with the OpenSource definition. The approval was given with a longer delay after the FSF explained that the GPL has to be interpreted in a way that makes it OSS compliant. So are you kidding? Jörg -- EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni) joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos