On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:32 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I asked here a week or so ago, and referenced an older bug, but haven't
> seen any comments. Googling, I see others asking about the same. Datum:
> *every* one I've found is like this: they're all HP DL580's or DL380's, or
> such.
>
> This is being used for heavy-duty scientific computing. Does anyone know
> if it *will* it seriously affect throughput speed if I turn off
> irqbalance?
>
> It's running 6.4, btw.
>
> mark
You referred to http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6319 in your
earlier post. If you believe you are hit by the bug reported there, I
strongly urge you to test the centosplus kernel that has a patch (see
note 17700 of the bug report).
Regarding the current status, upstream BZ (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887006 ) is open to the
public. It is "on QA" at the moment. I suspect the fix will be in
EL6.5 and possibly in a 6.4 kernel update.
Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
