back to: kernel: do_IRQ: 2.96 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

I asked here a week or so ago, and referenced an older bug, but haven't
seen any comments. Googling, I see others asking about the same. Datum:
*every* one I've found is like this: they're all HP DL580's or DL380's, or
such.

This is being used for heavy-duty scientific computing. Does anyone know
if it *will* it seriously affect throughput speed if I turn off
irqbalance?

It's running 6.4, btw.

        mark



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos