Re: ghostscript-8.70-14.el5_8.1.x86_64 & hylafax+ 5.5.3

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I am a new hylafax+ user and other than the ghostscript problem I am
> very impressed.  Hylafax+ does allow you to control the location of
> ghostscript so once I get it compiled I should be able to point it to
> the correct version.  Instead of using the Fedora RPM, I am going to
> compile it and try to route the files to a different location.  I really
> screwed up a different system trying to do an rpm install with a Fedora
> module with a different piece of software.  I am a little gun shy about
> doing that again.
>
> I am using Hylafax+ on CentOS 5.9 to replace a vsifax system installed
> on SCO.  If I can get ghostscript 9.07 installed properly this will be a
> very good replacement.
>
> If any of you have additional suggestions, I sure appreciate your help.

It doesn't help with this particular problem, but is there some reason
for using CentOS 5.x vs. 6.x?

-- 
   Les Mikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos