On 01/04/13 16:53, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> On 30/03/13 7:18, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>> On 29/03/13 10:38, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> On 03/29/2013 01:23 AM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>>>> Immediately after getting dropped to rdshell, I looked around in /dev,
>>>> which brought me a few surprises...
>
>>>> /dev/mapper contains only "control", that is, "vg_resolve02-lv_root" is
>>>> missing.
>
>>> Did you get to look at or for /dev/vg_resolve02 as well?
>
>>>> /dev/root is a symlink to /dev/dm-0
>
>>> Does /dev/dm-0 exist?
>
>>> Does the system boot if you just "exit" from the rdshell? What about if
>>> you "vgchange -a y" without changing the symlink?
>
>> I checked this a bit more thoroughly. The status is as follows:
>
>> When I boot up and get dropped to rdshell, neither /dev/root nor
>> /dev/vg_resolve02, nor /dev/dm-0 exist. Just exiting at this point drops
>> me back into rdshell. Waiting a few minutes makes no difference.
>
>> Doing lvm vgscan finds the volume group, but creates no device nodes.
>> Just exiting at this point drops me back into rdshell as well.
>
>> When I do lvm vgchange -ay, /dev/dm-0 is created, /dev/root is created
>> as a symlink to it, as well as /dev/vg_resolve02/ with lv_root inside
>> it, and /dev/mapper/vg_resolve02-lv_root. I don't need to change the
>> symlink or do anything else, if I exit after doing lvm vgchange -ay,
>> everything is ok.
>
>
>>>> That means /dev/root already is correct, so the only thing I'm actually
>>>> changing to make the system boot is to scan for volume groups and
>>>> activate them.
>
>>>> The big question then becomes: Why do I have to do this manually? How do
>>>> I make Dracut (I assume this is Dracut's job) make this automatically?
>
>>> udev should be doing this. And... I was just looking at this again,
>>> because the last time I came up with nothing useful. Look at
>>> /usr/share/dracut/modules.d/90lvm/64-lvm.rules. If I'm reading this
>>> correctly, udev will look for dm-0 in /sys and will not run lvm_scan if
>>> it's found. I wonder if it's possible that the /sys nodes are getting
>>> set up, but device-mapper isn't setting up the nodes in /dev?
>
>> It turns out I was wrong about dm-0 already existing, it's created on
>> vgchange -ay. I'm looking at the file you mention, but I'm afraid I
>> don't know LVM well enough to make that much sense of it. From what I
>> can tell, it calls lvm_scan for each device, and there's an lvm_scan.sh
>> in there that looks like it should be doing lvchange -ay, but if dm-0
>> doesn't already exist, I don't think this will do anything, am I wrong?
>
>
>>> I'm really at a loss... it seems like a much simpler explanation is
>>> simply that the devices take so long to detect that init gives up. When
>>> you run vgchange, they've had the time they need. That idea is
>>> inconsistent with the fact that your dmesg output shows what I assume is
>>> the correct devices and partition tables.
>>
>>> You could try adding "rdinitdebug rdudevdebug" to your kernel command
>>> line, but you're going to see a LOT of output, and it's only really
>>> going to be meaningful if you've read the /init script that Dracut
>>> creates, and understand more or less what it's doing, particularly in
>>> the "main_loop" section.
>
>> I can try this, but it might be a bit beyond my area of expertise, I'm
>> afraid.
>
>> If I were to just try a brute force approach, what RPM packages should I
>> reinstall/update to get all this stuff reinstalled as it was the first
>> time I installed the system?
>
> Just bumping this up, any ideas about this? It's a little annoying not
> having this box boot by itself...
And bumping this again... Any ideas? Anyone?
--
Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal
joakim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
